- Political ecology: a critical agenda for change | University College London
- Citations per year
- Political ecology, territoriality and scale
Send us a new image. Is this product missing categories? Add more categories. Review This Product. Welcome to Loot. Checkout Your Cart Price. Description Details Customer Reviews This groundbreaking collection brings together for the first time diverse geographical work on the social construction of nature.
Eleven leading contributors not only discuss social nature, but look at the concrete ways in which it is made and the political implications of its construction. Neoliberalising nature: processes, effects, and evaluations N Castree Environment and planning A 40 1 , , Spaces of work: Global capitalism and geographies of labour N Castree Sage , The nature of produced nature: materiality and knowledge construction in Marxism N Castree Antipode 27 1 , , Nature climate change 4 9 , , Thinking through work: complex inequalities, constructions of difference and trans-national migrants L McDowell Progress in Human Geography 32 4 , , The construction of nature and the nature of construction N Castree, B Braun Remaking reality: Nature at the millenium, , From neoliberalism to neoliberalisation: consolations, confusions, and necessary illusions N Castree Environment and Planning A 38 1 , , Making sense of nature N Castree Routledge , Environmental issues: relational ontologies and hybrid politics N Castree Progress in human geography 27 2 , , The point of departure for the contributors to this collection is the observation that KT is based upon a reductive understanding of translation and knowledge transmission.
Quantitative and qualitative contributions from a range of disciplinary perspectives are welcomed, including, but not restricted to, anthropology, cultural studies and cultural history, medicine, medical humanities, sociology, science and technology studies, philosophy, comparative literature, and translation studies. This is a rolling article collection and as such, submissions will be welcomed at any point up until the end of October There is a boom in initiatives calling for citizen involvement in research under the recent label of Citizen Science.
Citizen Science is on the one hand a new instrument to integrate citizens into scientific knowledge production with the help of digital infrastructures. On the other hand, there is a Citizen Science movement aimed at democratizing science. While numerous Citizen Science projects have been installed in various disciplines in recent years, some of them with great success, the social sciences are lagging behind. Within what has been termed as Citizen Social Science, the aim of this article collection is therefore not only to explore the possibilities for Citizen Science in the social sciences, but also to subject the Citizen Science phenomenon to a social science analysis.
Digital technologies are increasingly facilitating the collective generation of data, particularly in terms of the mushrooming of crowd-sourced data initiatives in a variety of fields across the sciences, politics, and industry. However, most initiatives working with citizen scientists include them only in certain steps of the research process, rather than more systematically and from the outset. Despite the vast potential of active citizenship for Citizen Social Science: active citizenship vs.
Political ecology: a critical agenda for change | University College London
Moreover, it is widely debated how sustainable the involvement of citizens via digital platforms can be, particularly in terms of renewing or maintaining citizen enthusiasm and motivation to participate. The aim of this collection is twofold: to explore the drivers and barriers to the systemic participation of citizens in all research phases to produce socially robust knowledge outcomes; and to open up the debate on the possibilities of blending, overlapping or confronting the different participatory methodologies already present in the field of social sciences, and the current approaches in citizen science projects.
This is a rolling article collection and as such submissions will be welcomed at any point up until the end of September Academia faces ever new challenges as the sector continues to grow and experience profound changes. Vibrant research in science and technology studies has made specialised knowledge production an object of empirical analysis. And specialists in higher education studies have traced the dynamics of power among academics.
Against this backdrop, the objectives of this research collection are twofold: first, to respond to a need for a new niche of integrative, systematic research on academia as power and knowledge; and, second, to make a difference in the broader debate about academia by responding to the challenges of higher education today. Empirical and theoretical research is welcomed that systematically investigates social practices in academia as well as critically reflects on academic practices in society.
While academic research usually aims at the systematic production of specialised knowledge, more research is needed on the conditions that make such knowledge possible. Special emphasis is therefore placed on academia as a social practice of academics at the nexus of power and knowledge. This is a rolling article collection and as such submissions will be welcomed at any point up until the end of November These concepts apply, in the first instance, to social and cultural threats — that is, to behaviours or visual qualities, which are deemed unacceptable because they are perceived as either amoral or unimaginable.
Against the backdrop, we invite papers that explore the concepts of monsters, monstrosity and the monstrous. Contributions are welcomed on, but are not restricted to, the following themes:. Research is invited from the humanities literature, drama, art, history and the social sciences education and teacher training studies, psychology, counselling studies , as well as interdisciplinary scholarship. There is a diverse community of policymakers, funders, scholars, and practitioners of different types all working in the field of evidence use. This is both wasteful of scarce resources, and risks leading to a stagnation of the field.
We therefore propose a multi-disciplinary collection of papers, to push forward the field and showcase this journal as a unique outlet for novel scholarship in this area, including empirical, methodological and theoretical work. We welcome insights from all geographic perspectives, to ensure that the global community working in this area is reflected.
In particular, we seek studies that provide truly novel insights into how evidence for policy and practice is made, negotiated, translated and used, from theoretical, methodological or practical perspectives. Instead, we are looking specifically for papers that make novel methodological or theoretical contributions, building on the existing field of literature about evidence use. Read the Collection Editors' Comment article 'Transforming evidence for policy and practice: creating space for new conversations'. The project can be a matter for individuals, increasingly made to feel responsible for their own wellbeing under the auspices of a new public health and preventive medicine.
It is also a matter for local and national administrations, struggling with tight budgets and demands on services, mindful of the costs of the treatment and management of chronic conditions.
- Logic, sets and recursion.
- Gendered natures: feminism, politics and social nature.
- The Football Men: Up Close with the Giants of the Modern Game.
- Comprar por categoría;
- Comprar por categoría?
- Analyzing Time Interval Data : Introducing an Information System for Time Interval Data Analysis;
- Noel Castree & Bruce Braun, Social Nature Theory, Practice, and Politics - PhilPapers.
It can have international dimensions. Often structured by the legacies of colonialism and by international advisory bodies and aid programs, global health has long been concerned with issues of inequality and the responsibilities, some would say the self-interests, of high income countries. More recently still, health has become a collective project, tying together people, nonhuman animals and ecologies One Health , and planetary processes Planetary Health.
In their different ways, all of these versions of health and health promotion imply a collective transdisciplinary endeavour. What ties them together is a common call for new kinds of public participation, engagement and social contract. In this article collection we invite papers that grapple with health as a collective, contested, public, process. We ask authors to engage with how health has been made public in the past and how the contemporary period generates opportunities and constraints for public health and the development of healthy publics.
We encourage contributions across different socio-cultural, historical, legal, political and economic settings, as well as across health domains including human, animal and environmental health. Papers can highlight the processes and struggles involved in generating public involvement and articulating health issues; in making specific health issues public through processes such as advocacy for resource and transformative interventions; in generating the evidence that makes a difference to health practice and is responsive to concerns that are articulated by groups and communities; or in developing a public mandate for concerted and coordinated action.
Papers are particularly welcome from non-Eurocentric perspectives, a variety of historical periods, geographical settings and across a range of substantive and material issues. Read papers published in this collection. The rise of big data in health care research, particularly when incorporated into health care delivery, presents a complex landscape where the role, status and value of the patient or citizen as a research subject is configured in numerous ways.
Social science scholars have drawn attention to the potential for health research participation to constitute exploitation, empowerment or even a form of contemporary citizenship. Emerging big data research practices add another dimension to these issues. They raise questions about how we make sense of health research participation in the change towards datafication of human health, and the automation of data agglomeration and analysis. Such practices also raise questions about their governance by prompting us to ask whether existing local and centralised ethical regimes are fit for purpose.
From trial subject to patient advisory group member, from biobank donor to the infinitely searchable database entry, each of these forms are affected in some way by emerging big data practices. Participation is complicated further by research itself becoming more globally collaborative and thus dealing with multiple local contexts.
This collection seeks to examine the diverse ways big data and health research participation converge and are co-produced with local and centralised approaches to governance. Drawing from the fields of sociology, anthropology, science and technology studies, health research, empirical ethics, bioethics, and critical data studies, we ask authors to engage with these two overarching questions: How is the health research participant constituted, valued and assetised in the era of big data?
Theoretical and empirical accounts from individual or multiple healthcare settings are welcome.
Citations per year
We envisage that this collection will facilitate a global dialogue on these issues. This is a rolling article collection and as such submissions will be welcomed at any point up until 31 December The social, environmental and economic challenges confronting academics, policymakers and other stakeholders do not come in neat packages.
For example, the stresses of transnational migration present questions for international lawyers, transport experts and conflict analysts alike, and the impacts of water scarcity equally call on civil engineers, anthropologists, natural hazard specialists and policy makers. Integrating the specialisations of different academic disciplines brings many challenges—not least organisational, bureaucratic, methodological, and cultural.
For instance, traditional academic research assessment practices can incentivise approaches to research that lack the interdisciplinary flexibility to engage with pressing societal challenges. Nevertheless there are today many emerging examples of innovative and impactful interdisciplinary collaborations, with interdisciplinary practices becoming a given in many areas of enquiry.here
Political ecology, territoriality and scale
Papers are invited that consider, but are not limited to, the following ideas:. This is a rolling article collection and as such submissions will be welcomed at any point up until December Read our related editorial. Expertise in the various dimensions of integration and implementation is an essential but often overlooked component of transformative research on complex societal and environmental problems, such as global climate change, illicit drug use, refugees and economic migration, spiralling health care costs, poverty and other social inequalities.
This research article collection addresses the specialised knowledge, skills, competencies and dispositional attributes required to, for example, identify which disciplinary and stakeholder knowledges are relevant, synthesise different perspectives, manage power imbalances and legacies of colonisation in researching problems, and accommodate conflicting values and world views, including across different cultures. This collection provides a platform where research expertise in integration and implementation for transformation can be recognised, described, synthesised, evaluated and improved.